Search Results
Searched for posts by DC33 in all forums

Showing results 171 - 180 out of 1692 total
Modify your search
Posted by DC33, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:43 pm
Its snowed twice this year and none last year.
Most year we get 4-6 plowable storms. I see no reason to have snow be a deterant to owning whatever car you want.

Two more plausable act would be to
1. Drive a different car in the snow, like a suv or truck
2. Just stay home the handfull of snow days a year, or wait about 12 hours for the roads to be all clear

Posted by DC33, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:07 pm
miloandbono wrote
drove a 911 4S yesterday, great all around car. Comfortable, good ground clearance, great sport exhaust, could probably drive it all year round. It did everything very well, but felt like it needed 50hp.

Why couldn't you drive an r8 year round???
Posted by DC33, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:14 am
fiorano94 wrote
Yeah, it's not like he has a lot of experience with what a good car is...


lol
well nothing can really compare to what he drives, just shocked he cant pick a car and stick to it
Posted by DC33, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:22 am
HoleInOne wrote
You're getting old....

Lol, I'm turing into the old muscle car type of guy who hates anything made after the 70s
Posted by DC33, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:20 am
miloandbono wrote
Dan, You should try to get your hands on a GT3 RS 4.0. I hear they are the shit. I heard Rahal say it was the one car he wish he kept.

The 4.0 are like 200k+, whil the 3.6 is under 100k and the 3.8 around 125k. Its hard to justify those costs for a dime a dozen 911 that just has everything stripped out. Hell a 997.2 (3.8) gt3 is around 80-100k, why is the RS still 25-45k more?
I could always just bore it out or something.

And I thouh he didn't like it at all? I though he said it was overrated andnothing that special and that's why he dumped it so fast? Who knows, he sell everything and keeps nothing, so it hard to take his thought too seriously when a car is just like another pair of underwear to him.
I mean he even told me the cgt was by far the bst car you could buy today, the he bought one, then sold it off.
Maybe a Camry is more his style
Posted by DC33, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:33 am
Mercedes tends to have alot of stuff first that ends up on cars 10 years later. Most is just :im better than you" crap that doesnt really change anything, but it makes you feel superior....then they start making it in Alabama and you have to take it into the dealer all the time to fix it
Posted by DC33, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:30 am
KSv10 wrote
So what are you going to drive that does not "suck" and is "exotic"?

cars made in the 80s, 90s, and some 2000's

Posted by DC33, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:29 am
I dont know what this is about, but Im interested
Posted by DC33, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:25 am
Dug <3

meh, theyre just lights to me. I cant see them when Im driving.
Im still amazed Audi was able to turn DRL into an actual design feature that not only people loved, but seperated them from the pack. Cheapest bang for the buck ever.
Despite cars, like my CGT, having led lights everywhere, I think they are dumb and just gimicky and the latest fad. soon they willbe just as cool as neon lights under your car all the ricers had.
All cars built after I think 2009 have to have HID or whatever kind of lights now that make the road lit up with white light. If I can see at night, Im happy, everythign else is rather pointless to me.
Posted by DC33, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:11 am
miloandbono wrote
gonna have to argue too Dan, I prefer Ferrari (458 and 599 GTO are my current favorites) over Lambo. Sorry no offence. I do think your former Carrera GT might have been the coolest best sounding car ever made.

ferrari and lamborghini are souless paddle shifting peices of shit these days
both suck and are corporatally dilluded excuses for cars, let alone "exotics" both suck, and both are dead to me