So I assume you guys want those forwarded to the emails you signed up with ?
Palmer I just sent a test email to palmercrampton at midwestscc, so let me know if it works

The NA1's were 1991 - 1996 and were 270hp 5 speeds. The 95 and 96's had Targa as an option (which added a bit of weight)

The NA2's 1997-2005 had the 290hp 6 speeds. The "facelift" occurred in 2002 and added about 6 mph top speed. All NA2's are targa's except the Zanardi edition which is the highest performance NSX you get in America)

Not us rice-rockets! Not only can I hit 30mpg, mine's a L.E.V. !!!

There slower and older.

Whats the advantages of the NA-1 Besides being cheaper and 150lbs lighter.

Were talking stock here.

I've been to 120 in 5th gear, I find it hard to believe 6th gear would end at 130.

bahhh the NA-2's weigh more than NA-1's I hate when they do that.

My cousin has an Ap2.

So the reason i care about this secpulation is im trying to help him make his decision.

He is trying to decided between keeping his AP2 and building it up. F/I and suspension blah blah. Basically flushing money down the toilet in terms of return investment.

OR.

Buying a NA 2 NSX. 50k-60k range.

OR> now this was my idea.

Buying a 08 Lotus Exige S240.


We've talked about it a ton and i thought he was pretty much decided on the NA-2.

But after this news the debate is back.

What do you guys think?

I'm pretty sure this is false & they will get into the 150 range. AP1 was drag limited to around 155 & AP2 is gear limited to around 150. Anyhow, from what I've heard (not personal experience) NA1 & AP2 are fairly similar in straightline acceleration. NA2 decimates AP2.